Turkey’s double-standard policy toward the Daesh (ISIL) terrorist group proves that Ankara has its own geopolitical goals in the region, analysts said.
Turkey has rejected a US proposal to deploy additional troops to seal the stretch of the Syrian-Turkish border controlled by Daesh terrorists, local media reported last week.The 98-kilometer stretch of the border is used by militants to transport fighters and smuggle oil from Syria. The Turkish Prime Minister explained that if the border is closed Ankara would not be able to accept refugees.
Davutoglu added that the Turkish budget could not afford the deployment of 30,000 troops to protect the border. The government also warned that closing the border may provoke Daesh to take “responsive measures.”
Davutoglu’s words contradicted US State Secretary John Kerry’s statement made on December 2 following talks between President Barack Obama and Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Ankara is interested in stopping the illegal oil trade and prevent foreign militants from travelling in both directions, Kerry said. According to the secretary, Erdogan expressed interest in the necessary measures.In turn, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said December 2 that Kurdish troops and US Special Operation forces could be deployed to close the border.
That makes a divergence. Either Ankara is continuing its game with Daesh and messing around with Moscow and Washington, or the US and Turkey are playing the same game and Ankara’s actions do not contradict the US’s strategic plan.
“Ankara’s statements prove that the Turkish government is in disarray,” Stanislav Tarasov, a Russian expert on the Middle East, told Svobodnaya Pressa. “Erdogan says one thing, and Davutoglu says another.”
At the same time, the US is really pressuring Turkey to close the border, he underscored.
“Recently the US State Department acknowledged that Daesh trades oil across the Syrian-Turkish border. This could mean that Washington is leaning toward Russia’s version and suspects Erdogan’s family of involvement in oil smuggling,” the analyst explained.
“Of course, Turkey is one of the US’s allies in NATO, and Washington tries not to disavow the Turkish policy. But it keeps pressing to close the border,” he added.
Ankara planned to establish a security zone along the 98-kilometer stretch of the Syrian-Turkish border. There, Turkey wanted to train militants to fight Syrian Kurds, Tarasov said. The US blocked the initiative and deployed its troops and aircraft to nearby areas.Nevertheless, Turkey still wants to impose its own scenario and is playing the Daesh card. “And it is losing the game,” he said. “The border is likely to be closed from the Syrian side. Terrorists will be forced from the border zone with allied airstrikes.”
“It is symptomatic of Turkey to be part of the anti-terrorist coalition and not to take part in such an operation,” Tarasov said.
Thus, Turkey is likely to continue using Daesh to achieve its own geopolitical goals. Probably, it will let militants move from the border zone to Turkish territory to save them from airstrikes and then move them to Iraq.
“In fact, Turkey would support Daesh on two fronts – in Syria and Iraq,” the analyst explained.
Turkey will be playing a double game. The border might be closed partially to make it look like a decision by the Turkish government, and not like a step back by Erdogan, Alexei Fenenko, a senior research fellow at the Russian Academy of Sciences, told Svobodnaya Pressa.”Erdogan understands if Ankara takes a back seat to Moscow and Washington and closes the border it would be a serious blow to Turkey’s reputation. It is not about oil business, it is all about reputation,” he said.
Moreover, Turkey is currently trying to show its military power as it is concerned about a coalition Russia, Greece, Armenia and Kurds are building against it, Fenenko added.
“As for Russia, we have means to respond to Turkey, and I’m talking about a military attack. Ankara realizes this, and tries to make Washington or London pledge their support for it,” he concluded.